Monday, 1 December 2014

Google “Pigeon” Updates Local Search Algorithm With Stronger Ties To Web Search Signal

pigeon-map2-ss-1920
Google has released a new algorithm to provide a more useful, relevant and accurate local search results that are tied more closely to traditional web search ranking signals. The changes will be visible within the Google Maps search results and Google Web search results.
Note: We’ve named this update the Pigeon update.
The core changes are behind the scenes, but it does impact local search results rankings and some local businesses may notice an increase or decrease in web site referrals, leads and business from the change.
Google told us that the new local search algorithm ties deeper into their web search capabilities, including the hundreds of ranking signals they use in web search along with search features such as Knowledge Graph, spelling correction, synonyms and more.
In addition, Google said that this new algorithm improves their distance and location ranking parameters.
The new algorithm is currently rolling out for US English results and aims to provide a more useful and relevant experience for searchers seeking local results. Google didn’t share any details about if and when the update would roll out more widely in other countries and languages.
Google has not commented on the percent of queries impacted by this algorithm update, nor if certain web spam algorithms were deployed in this update.
If you have noticed any ranking changes and referral changes for your local business, please let us know in the comments.

58% Of Local Marketers Will Change Tactics After Pigeon Update

Columnist Myles Anderson shares the results of an InsideLocal survey detailing the impact of Google's recent local algorithm update, Pigeon.

pigeon2-ss-1920
There has been much expert analysis and published research on the impact of Google’s Pigeon Update.
In this post, I am going to share the results of some recent polls we conducted with attendees on a recent InsideLocal webinar, the topic of which was “The Impact of Pigeon.” (Note: webinar recording can be watched here.)
We wanted to measure the experiences and observations of the 600+ SEOs and SMBs on the webinar to see how they compared to the published, “expert” viewpoints.
We asked 4 questions, and here is what we found out.

1. Has Pigeon Delivered Good Changes For Businesses & Searchers?

Pigeon Update - Good for Searchers and Businesses
Respondents: 402
Key Findings:
  • 69% believe that Pigeon has delivered good change for searchers
  • 53% believe that Pigeon is bad for businesses
Commentary:
The general consensus is that Pigeon has delivered better changes for searchers than for businesses.  The tighter geographic radius of results implies greater targeting of results, and the re-focusing of the “centroid” around the user and not the city makes results more user-centric.
There have been plenty of complaints about increased spam appearing in results, which isn’t good for anyone.
But this issue may be overplayed; renowned local search expert Mike Blumenthalpointed out during the webinar that increased spam is typical of other recent Google updates (e.g. Hummingbird), and Google will tackle this issue in time.

 2. Have You Changed Your Local Search Strategy Since Pigeon Update?

Have you changed strategy since Google Pigeon Update
Respondents: 441
Key Findings:
  • 58% have changed or plan to change their search strategy due to Pigeon update
  • 33% won’t change their search strategy
Commentary:
The majority of those who completed the poll have either adjusted their search strategy or plan to do so. A number of Pigeon studies have pointed towards more power being given to traditional organic search ranking factors, such as domain authority and links, while pure local signals have lost power.
What the poll didn’t ask (simply because we didn’t have time) is what these strategy changes include. An obvious conclusion would be that SEOs/SMBs would focus more on such Organic signals, but is this a wise move? Google will release further updates which may reverse the direction they’ve taken here.
The consensus of the expert panelists on last week’s webinar (who were Mike BlumenthalJoy Hawkins and Andrew Shotland) is that businesses shouldn’t obsess about Google. They are better off focusing on a diversified marketing strategy which focuses on activities which build their brand, reputation and relationships.
This will ultimately deliver more customers from a variety of sources and most likely greater search visibility with it. Google will reward businesses that have high trust & engagement factors.

3. Have You Gained Or Lost Traffic Since Pigeon?

Impact on website traffic since Pigeon Update
Respondents: 365
Key Findings:
  • 37% have lost traffic vs. 28% who gained traffic
  • 87% saw only a small amount of change
Commentary:
In this poll we asked about all search traffic; we didn’t specify local search traffic vs. organic traffic.
The results show that any shifts in traffic have been minor for the majority of businesses — just 13% have seen significant losses or gains. It’s likely that those that lost significant traffic have some fundamental issues with either their organic signals or their Google+ Listings (e.g. hidden dupes or “closed location” dupes, which are massively dragging them down).
Some industries have seen local packs stripped out completely (e.g. Realtors) so these are likely be some of the worst affected businesses.
On the whole, more businesses claimed to have lost traffic rather than gained. But is this drop in quantity offset by an increase in quality? Let’s find out….

4.  Have You Received Better Converting Traffic Since Pigeon?

Better Converting Leads Since Pigeon Update
Respondents: 376
Key Findings:
  • 24% have witnessed worse converting traffic vs. 18% who have had better converting traffic
  • 58% have seen no change pre/post Pigeon
Commentary:
Much has been made of the increased relevance of results since Pigeon. Tighter geo-graphic radii and smaller pack sizes should be giving users a more targeted set of businesses to choose from.
A common theory about Pigeon is that while volume of traffic may have dropped, the clicks generated would deliver more targeted traffic leading to higher conversion.
Unfortunately, the results of this poll don’t concur – 82% of respondents said they have seen the same or lower conversions, while just 18% have seen better converting traffic.

Conclusions

Considering the responses to all four survey questions, the overriding feeling is that Pigeon hasn’t delivered a major shock to most SEOs/SMBs. The impact of the update varies depending on the specific circumstances of a business and there are few clear winners or losers.
However, over 50% of businesses/consultants plan to modify their search strategies to cope better with these changes. These changes should certainly take a long-term view into account — i.e. less chasing down Google and more focus on building the reputation and authority of your business.
Given that both traffic volume and quality appear to be lower, now is a great time to diversify away from Google and build a more diverse customer engagement and acquisition strategy. If this is done well and builds brand value and authority, then increased search visibility should follow.

What Is The Google Pigeon Update?

Launched on July 24, 2014 for U.S. English results, the “Pigeon Update” is a new algorithm to provide more useful, relevant and accurate local search results that are tied more closely to traditional web search ranking signals. Google stated that this new algorithm improves their distance and location ranking parameters.

Tuesday, 18 November 2014

Facebook preparing new website for office use
"Facebook is secretly working on a new website called 'Facebook at Work'" that would allow users to "chat with colleagues, connect with professional contacts and collaborate over documents", it said.

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

Google HTTPS: Run On A Per URL Basis In Real Time & Not Part Of Panda

As we learn more about the Google HTTPS algorithm I want to keep you posted.

Three new tidbits came out on the topic through yesterday's Google webmaster hangout with Google's John Mueller on Google+.
(1) The HTTPS algorithm is completely separate from Google's Panda algorithm or any other algorithm. I am not sure why there was confusion on that but it is separate.
(2) The algorithm is a live algorithm and run in real-time. It is not run monthly or pushed manually. So you don't need to wait long for it to kick in. It basically kicks in when the new URL is indexed.
(3) It is not a site wide algorithm but rather an algorithm run on a URL by URL basis. So if some of your URLs are HTTPS and some are not, only the HTTPS URLs will benefit and not the HTTP URLs.

Saturday, 26 July 2014

9 SEO Techniques to Dominate the Most Popular Methods of Content Discovery


types_of_searchesGoogle gets roughly 3.5 billion searches a day, there are really only three types of searches that people perform -- navigational, informational, and transactional. If you want get more people to find you in search, you need to know how to optimize your content for each of these types. 
In this article, I’m going to explain each of the three types of searches and give a bit of perspective on why each one is important. Then, I’ll provide you with some tactical methods for unleashing a strategy that will allow you to dominate the SERPs for that search type. 

Navigational Search

What It Is

navigational search is when a user searches for a specific website by typing in the name of that website (not the URL). 
Someone who wants to find my site, Quicksprout, might perform this navigational search:
neil_1
They did not type in the address: “www.quicksprout.com.” They typed in the name of my company using a search engine or maybe just the browser bar.

Why It Matters

Navigational search is used by new and repeat visitors.

The point of origin for many searches is the browser’s address bar. If you want to buy a book of Amazon, you might do something like ...
  • Open a new tab on your browser
  • Type in “Amazon” in the address bar
  • Hit “enter.”
You just performed a navigational search. Search engines and browsers make it easy to find a website with a few quick keystrokes. Why pull up a bookmark when you can type in ”quicksprout” with ease?
The searchers who find your site by typing in your site’s name are both new and repeat visitors, but they are mostly repeat visitors. They already know the name of your site. How else would someone know how to type in “quicksprout?” It’s not exactly a normal word or an informational search. 
But there are also new visitors who may have heard of the site or seen it mentioned elsewhere. They, too, will find the site using a navigational search, often with some hybrid informational keywords thrown in for good measure, like these:
  • quicksprout neil patel
  • quick sprout seo
  • sprout quick seo advice
  • advanced guides sprout

Navigational search is used by searchers who are more likely to convert.

Your branded keywords are some of your most important. Why? Because they help the people who are looking for your site to find your site.
These are some of your most valuable visitors! Time and again, visitors who land on my sites using branded or navigational searches are far more likely to convert. They know what they want, and they are searching for it. They are ready to convert.

How to Dominate It

Just be.

As long as you have a unique brand name, you stand a strong chance of dominating the SERPs for your navigational keyword. It’s not too hard.
Google’s algorithm is designed to award navigational searches -- most of the search results point directly to the site that the user was navigationally searching for.
"Keyword searches with organic links, which tend to be branded/navigational searches -- appear to be showing 7 or fewer organic listings, instead of the usual 10."
The upside of this? 
"[These] top 7 listings in branded/navigational searches have an increasing tendency to be from the same domain(s)."
If that’s not domination, I don’t know what is.
Even though you can accomplish navigational search domination without severe backbreaking effort, you still need to do some things right.

Use the navigational keyword in your page title (without keyword stuffing).

Titles, the most important SEO feature of any given page, should contain your navigational keywords (without feeling unnatural). Even though my slogan is “I’m kind of a big deal,” I know that my brand name should be featured on my page title. Thus, I use “Quick Sprout - I’m kind of a big deal” as my title. This brings in the navigational queries that are looking for “quicksprout,” “quick sprout,” or even “sprout quick.”
quick_sprout_meta

Emphasize your brand name.

In today’s search world, brand identity matters more than ever. Brands are now competing for keyword space, not in the traditional informational arena, but in the marketing and brand-related sense. Brand stature is everything.
The more you can saturate the market with your brand identity by creating quality content, the better time you will have of embedding your brand name into the minds of searchers, and therefore gaining more future navigational searches.
In earlier days (circa 2008) the vast majority of searches were informational, which led to the meteoric rise of content marketing a couple of short years later. Today, instead of the paltry 10% of search market share it used to have, navigational search is much more dominant and much more important today.
Your brand name is a great search handle -- your strongest even. Use it, promote it, protect it, and optimize the heck out of it. 

Informational Search

What It Is

Informational searches are those in which the user is looking for information -- how to make a strawberry pie, how long to make a title tag, the height of Pike’s Peak, the best surfboard wax, etc.
An informational search looks like this:
neil_2
Informational searches in a post-Hummingbird era include a wide array of semantic attributes that implement search intent and contextual meaning.
Informational searches are vast and unwieldy because of their huge number, huge variety, and complex semantic attributes. Semantic searches receive search results that are massaged and tweaked by the algorithm in the following ways:
  • The algorithm adjusts for morphological variation.
  • The algorithm adjusts for contextual synonyms.
  • The algorithm handles generalizations.
  • The algorithm provides concept matching results.
  • The algorithm provides knowledge matching results.
  • The algorithm understands natural language queries and interrogatives.
Google’s Knowledge Graph is the most noticeable semantic search implementation in the search world. Its ability to translate, parse, and deliver intelligent results in the Knowledge Graph is a direct attribute of its finely-tuned semantic search capabilities.

Why It Matters

Informational searches are the rubber-meets-the-road of SEO. This is where the power of content is truly unleashed.

How to Dominate It

In order to dominate informational searches, you have to dominate inbound marketing. It’s just that simple. This article makes no pretense to being a guide to inbound marketing. You can read about that in another guide.

Create a domain or brand that uses it.

One way to get more informational searchers to your site is to create a domain or brand name that includes that informational search query.
Let me illustrate this by using “content marketing” as an example. If I search for “content marketing blog,” I’m obviously looking for some information on content marketing -- most likely a good blog or website that has some things to teach me about content marketing. Here’s what I get:
neil_3
Content Marketing Institute dominates the SERPs. They have a domain and brand name that takes ownership of the informational keyword, forcing the algorithm to deliver it in the results. Remember how Google’s algorithm is designed to favor branded or navigational searches? Since that is true, and since the Content Marketing Institute has the term “content marketing” in their brand name, they pop to the top of the results -- the first three organic results, as a matter of fact. 
Claiming a brand or domain with your target keyword doesn’t work for everyone. I don’t recommend it as a must-have, but if it does play into your overall brand strategy, then you’ve got a leg up.
The one place where you should emphasize brand/informational keyword ownership is with your personal name. Your name is your most valuable asset for personal branding, and you should use it as part of your domain if possible. 

Define your niche.

Your most important effort is to define exactly what keywords you want to dominate. You only need to focus on the set of keywords that your target audience is searching for. 
Once you know what keywords you’re going to target, you can start to own them through content domination on that topic. If you create more articles, in-depth information, infographics, videos, and images on a topic than anyone else on the planet (and they're quality), you will dominate the SERPs for that topic.

Build your domain authority.

Successfully gaining informational search volume is going to be hard unless you have domain authority. The only way to build authority, of course, is through consistent content marketing and earned off-site links.

Create pages that contain relevant keywords in the URL.

When it comes to SEO, your URL is a powerful feature for gaining informational search. The algorithm favors search results that implement the target keyword. Notice how this works out in this general one-word query for “truck.” The first organic result is Wikipedia, obviously, then some Knowledge Graph news, and then this:
neil_4
These sites have strong domain authority and rich content on their websites, but they also have astrategic URLs. Each URL includes the target keyword, thus creating an entry into the SERPs. In essence, the URL "brands" the term -- the URL creates an algorithmic identifier of ownership over that particular keyword. 
If you are targeting a certain keyword, I recommend making pages that use that keyword explicitly. (Though, as always, this should feel natural -- not spammy.)

Transactional Search

What It Is

Transactional searches are those in which the searcher is searching for something that they are prepared to purchase or convert on. I call these "wallet-out, ready-to-buy" searchers. They are positioned precisely at a point in the buying cycle where they are willing and prepared to spend money. Landing pages and product pages target this kind of search.
Here’s an example:
neil_5
Many times, the searches use terms like “buy,” “purchase,” “price,” “promotion,” “deal,” “discount,” etc. Either way, the algorithm intuits that the user wants to make a purchase, so it provides SERP information that is relevant to a purchase.
neil_6

Why It Matters

Transactional searches reflect a user’s desire to buy something. They are prepared to convert. Little needs to be done to push them over the edge.
Although these searches comprise the least amount of search volume, they are the most conversion-ready.

How to Dominate It

“Dominate” in the context of transactional searches is not easy. In fact, unless you have a really, really niche product, complete SERP domination is impossible. You can, however, vastly improve your SERP appearance with the following techniques.

Use schema markup.

Most transactional searches have Knowledge Graph results in Google. You need to be using markup if you want to land a spot on the product carousels, produce price displays, or feature other KG information.
Google has proved already that it prefers sites that have markup. If you are not using markup, you are neglecting a chance to gain a spot in Google’s informative and relevant results.

Create information on the product that includes transactional keywords.

Google rewards content over against strictly purchase pages. If you want to gain the attention and search traffic of transactional users, create content surrounding their transactional query. 
For example the query “order vacuum cleaner online” is obviously transactional. However, Yahoo’s shopping site has scored some serious content points by creating a page withinformation -- comparing prices, reading reviews, finding deals, etc.
neil_7
The transactional user will be interested in this content, because it is both transactional and informational. The user’s end goal is to buy, but the page promises information that will make the purchase even better.

Conclusion

Although search engine optimization has changed a ton over the past few years, the three main types of searches haven’t changed. Searchers are still using navigational, informational, and transactional searches to get what they want. 
For you, the business owner, SEO, or marketer, it boils down to this: Give users what they want. Create content and information that the user is searching for.

Monday, 7 July 2014

The 4 Truths About Link Building


  • The world of link building hasn’t just evolved over the last couple of years — it has been completely turned upside down. In essence, what in many ways was once a relatively easy business has become a formidable venture to maintain.
chain and lock
Just a few years ago, finding sources to build links in bulk was a highly profitable business model for SEOs. Clients were willing to pay premium prices for link building and the associated benefits to their businesses’ search results. Today, however, the growing challenge of Google penalties has reduced the effectiveness of old link building activities down to little more than a nice memory.

The Current Status Quo

The foremost challenge SEOs face today is that dedicating the amount of time required to research sites and build the “right” links is simply not feasible without charging clients a whole lot more money. While increasing the price may initially sound like the ideal solution, that idea quickly goes out the window.
In order to justify the price increase, you would need to explain how much harder the work is now and why. But doing this can have a rebound effect — some clients could be left feeling that they’ve been “had.”
The challenges here can be exacerbated if your clients have experienced a decline in their rankings as the new algorithms take hold.

Is There Any Hope?

If a rate increase is not palatable to your clients and the status quo is not palatable to your business, it’s time to start looking at things in a new way. Following are four tactics to help your SEO business model adjust to the new landscape in a profitable and vital way.
Eliminate Link Building
There are some who say that the best link building strategy today is to stop doing it altogether. Instead of focusing on building links, focus on publishing great content in the right places. Quality links will naturally spring from quality content.
Create A True Team Approach
Many agencies talk about becoming a valued team member of their clients’ companies. Now is the time for you to really do this. Have your clients be part of the solution, creating a greater sense of partnership with you and a better understanding on their part of all that goes into SEO.
Instruct them to provide you with lists of blogs that they, their family members or their employees regularly read. Have them collect information about special events they are involved with, including charity events in their local communities. Ask them for details about any groups or organizations that they sponsor, such as a little league team or school choir. By forming this team relationship with your clients, you gain access to tons of “quality” local content that will turn into the high quality links that search engines love.
Use Tools Wisely
Sure, there are tools out there that are designed to automate link building to a large degree. Backlink Builder and Citation Labs Link Prospector are just two examples. Although the true ability of these programs is limited, that does not mean you should throw them out the window.
These link building applications can help to get your creative juices flowing. Use them as part of your initial brainstorming and to broaden the scope of where you search for good content publishing opportunities.
Educate Your Clients
One of the criticisms commonly thrown out about SEOs is that they are all “smoke and mirrors.” These types of comments often result from a lack of knowledge and understanding about what an SEO really does. Instead of hiding information from your clients, educate and empower them.
When you show trust in your clients and are willing to help them learn, you will gain their loyalty and appreciation — critical ingredients in today’s marketplace. The benefit goes two ways—the more your clients understand your work, the better able they will be to help you by providing the level of information you need from them.
Taking a new approach to your SEO services can not only keep you in business but help your business thrive. There will no doubt be SEOs that stick to the tried and true, and for this you should be grateful — their clients today are likely to be yours tomorrow if you are willing to shift with the algorithms.

It’s Not Really Harder, Just Different

Today, content marketing is the heart and soul of SEO. Embrace this change and you will achieve the results your clients are expecting in a natural way—results that your clients will happily pay for.

Wednesday, 2 July 2014

Google Expands Mobile App Indexing in Search Results
Did you hear the news that Google is now indexing more mobile app content in its search results? That means, for those who have apps installed on their mobile devices, they could be seeing more relevant app content for their search queries. And with that announcement, Google also mentioned a huge opportunity for app creators: Android app indexing is now available to all.
Back in April and in May, Google revealed expansions to the feature it rolled out in December 2013. If you’re not familiar with the way it works, those searching on a mobile device can be served results from content within an app installed on their phone if it’s relevant to the query. 
As Google puts it, "Sometimes the best answer is on a website, and sometimes it's in an app." With the latest announcement, Google also says there would be modifications to the way the app results were displayed. 
App result title links take you directly to the content inside the app. This makes it even easier to access apps from Google. You can tell if a result will take you to an app by looking at the green text just below it. If the green text is the name of an app you've installed and has an app icon next to it, then you’ll know the result will link to an app. If the green text is a website URL, then you know the result will link to a webpage.
app-indexing-content
In addition, Google unveiled its "biggest batch yet" of Android apps it supports, including BuzzFeed, The Washington Post, Airbnb, and more.
But it's not just the most popular brands that are supported. If you’re interested in your own Android app being indexed for content you think is relevant to your audience, Google says "app deep links" can help you
App deep links in search results help your users find your content more easily and re-engage with your app after they’ve installed it. As a site owner, you can show your users the right content at the right time — by connecting pages of your website to the relevant parts of your app you control when your users are directed to your app and when they go to your website.
Google outlined a simple two-part process for apps to start using deep links, which includes adding deep link support to the app, then connecting the website and the app (in order for Google to recognize the app is the "official" app for that website).
The tech giant also revealed a new feature in Google Webmaster Tools that helps app owners debug issues that could arise as a result of app indexing, including "a QR code for the app deep links, so you can easily open them on your phone or tablet," Google said in its announcement.
"We’ll send you Webmaster Tools error notifications as well, so you can keep up to date."


Monday, 30 June 2014

The Technology behind Google’s great results..

As a Google user, you’re familiar with the speed and accuracy of a Google search. How exactly does Google manage to find the right results for every query as quickly as it does? The heart of Google’s search technology is PigeonRank™, a system for ranking web pages developed by Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin at Stanford University.
Building upon the breakthrough work of B. F. Skinner, Page and Brin reasoned that low cost pigeon clusters (PCs) could be used to compute the relative value of web pages faster than human editors or machine-based algorithms. And while Google has dozens of engineers working to improve every aspect of our service on a daily basis, PigeonRank continues to provide the basis for all of our web search tools.

Tuesday, 3 June 2014

Searchable Dynamic Content With AJAX Crawling:


Google Search likes simple, easy-to-crawl websites. You like dynamic websites that show off your work and that really pop. But search engines can’t run your JavaScript. That cool AJAX routine that loads your content is hurting your SEO.
Google’s robots parse HTML with ease; they can pull apart Word documents, PDFs and even images from the far corners of your website. But as far as they’re concerned, AJAX content is invisible.

The Problem With AJAX

AJAX has revolutionized the Web, but it has also hidden its content. If you have a Twitter account, try viewing the source of your profile page. There are no tweets there — just code! Almost everything on a Twitter page is built dynamically through JavaScript, and the crawlers can’t see any of it. That’s why Google developed AJAX crawling.
Because Google can’t get dynamic content from HTML, you will need to provide it another way. But there are two big problems: Google won’t run your JavaScript, and it doesn’t trust you.
Google indexes the entire Web, but it doesn’t run JavaScript. Modern websites are little applications that run in the browser, but running those applications as they index is just too slow for Google and everyone else.
The trust problem is trickier. Every website wants to come out first in search results; your website competes with everyone else’s for the top position. Google can’t just give you an API to return your content because some websites use dirty tricks like cloakingto try to rank higher. Search engines can’t trust that you’ll do the right thing.
Google needs a way to let you serve AJAX content to browsers while serving simple HTML to crawlers. In other words, you need the same content in multiple formats.

Two URLs For The Same Content

Let’s start with a simple example. I’m part of an open-source project called Spiffy UI. It’s a Google Web Toolkit (GWT) framework for REST and rapid development. We wanted to show off our framework, so we made SpiffyUI.org using GWT.
GWT is a dynamic framework that puts all of our content in JavaScript. Our index.htmlfile looks like this:
<body>
   <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"
   src="org.spiffyui.spsample.index.nocache.js"></script>
</body>
Everything is added to the page with JavaScript, and we control our content with hash tags (I’ll explain why a little later). Every time you move to another page in our application, you get a new hash tag. Click on the “CSS” link and you’ll end up here:
http://www.spiffyui.org#css
The URL in the address bar will look like this in most browsers:
http://www.spiffyui.org/?css
This simple hash works well for our application and makes it bookmarkable, but it isn’t crawlable. Google doesn’t know what a hash tag means or how to get the content from it, but it does provide an alternate method for a website to return content. So, we let Google know that our hash is really JavaScript code instead of just an anchor on the page by adding an exclamation point (a “bang”), like this:
http://www.spiffyui.org#!css
This hash bang is the secret sauce in the whole AJAX crawling scheme. When Google sees these two characters together, it knows that more content is hidden by JavaScript. It gives us a chance to return the full content by making a second request to a special URL:
http://www.spiffyui.org?_escaped_fragment_=css
The new URL has replaced the #! with ?_escaped_fragment_=. Using a URL parameter instead of a hash tag is important, because parameters are sent to the server, whereas hash tags are available only to the browser.