Wednesday, 22 July 2015

Google Panda 4.2 Is Here; Slowly Rolling Out After Waiting Almost 10 Months

Google says a Panda refresh began this weekend, but will take months to fully roll out.



google-panda-cop1-fade-ss-1920
Google tells Search Engine Land that it pushed out a Google Panda refresh this weekend.
Many of you may not have noticed because this roll out is happening incredibly slowly. Google says the update can take months to fully roll out because it will slowly impact your site. The Panda algorithm is still a site-wide algorithm, but some of your web pages might not see a change immediately.
The last time we had an official Panda refresh was almost 10 months ago: Panda 4.1happened on September 25, 2014. That was the 28th update, but I would coin this the 29th or 30th update, since we saw small fluctuations in October 2014.
As far as I know, very few webmasters noticed a Google update this weekend. That is how it should be since this Panda refresh is rolling out very slowly.
Google said this impacted about 2-3% of English language queries.

New Chance For Some; New Penalty For Others

The rollout means anyone who was penalized by Panda in the last update has a chance to emerge if they made the right changes. So if you were hit by Panda, you unfortunately won’t notice the full impact immediately but you should see changes in your organic rankings gradually over time.
This is not how many of the past Panda updates rolled out, where typically you’d see a significant increase or decline in your Google traffic more quickly.

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

How Search Engines Process Links

Ever wondered how search engines crawl, analyze, index, and rank pages? Columnist Jenny Halasz has created a helpful primer on the link graph to answer these questions.

Have you ever wondered why 404s, rel=canonicals, noindex, nofollow, and robots.txt work the way they do? Or have you never been clear on quite how they do all work? To help you understand, here is a very basic interpretation of how search engines crawl pages and add links to the link graph.

The Simple Crawl

The search engine crawler (let’s make it a spider for fun) visits a site. The first thing it collects is the robots.txt file.
Let’s assume that file either doesn’t exist or says it’s okay to crawl the whole site. The crawler collects information about all of those pages and feeds it back into a database. Strictly, it’s a crawl scheduling system that de-duplicates and shuffles pages by priority to index later.
Basic crawl process
While it’s there, it collects a list of all the pages each page links to. If they’re internal links, the crawler will probably follow them to other pages. If they’re external, they get put into a database for later.
search-engine-spider2

Processing Links

Later on, when the link graph gets processed, the search engine pulls all those links out of the database and connects them, assigning relative values to them. The values may be positive, or they may be negative. Let’s imagine, for example, that one of the pages is spamming. If that page is linking to other pages, it may be passing some bad link value on to those pages. Let’s say S=Spammer, and G=Good:
search-engine-spider3
The page on the top right has more G’s than S’s. Therefore, it would earn a fairly good score. A page with only G’s would earn a better score. If the S’s outweighed the G’s, the page would earn a fairly poor score. Add to that the complications that some S’s and some G’s are worth more than others, and you have a very simplified view of how the link graph works.

Blocking Pages With Robots.txt

Let’s go back to that original example. Suppose the robots.txt file had told the search engine not to access one of those pages.
search-engine-spider4
That means that while the search engine was crawling through the pages and making lists of links, it wouldn’t have any data about that page that was included in the robots.txt file.
Now, go back to that super simple link graph example. Let’s suppose that the page on the top right was that page that was blocked by robots.txt:
search-engine-spider5
The search engine is still going to take all of the links to that page and count them. It won’t be able to see what pages that page links to, but it will be able to add link value metrics for the page — which affects the domain as a whole.

Using 404 Or 410 To Remove Pages

Next, let’s assume that instead of blocking that page with robots.txt, we simply removed it. So the search engine would try to access it, but get a clear message that it’s not there anymore.
search-engine-spider6
This means that when the link graph is processed, links to that page just go away. They get stored for later use if that page comes back.
search-engine-spider7
At some other point (and likely by a different set of servers!), priority pages that are crawled get assigned to an index.

How The Index Works

The index identifies words and elements on a page that match with words and elements in the database. Do a search for “blue widgets.” The search engine uses the database to find pages that are related to blue, widgets, and blue widgets. If the search engine also considers widget (singular) and cornflower (a type of blue) to be synonyms, it may evaluate pages with those words on the page as well.
The search engine uses its algorithm to determine which pages in the index have those words assigned to them, evaluates links pointing to the page and the domain, and processes dozens of other known and unknown metrics to arrive at a value. If the site is being filtered for poor behavior like Panda or Penguin, that is also taken into account. The overall value then determines where in the results the page will appear.
This is further complicated by things webmasters might do to manipulate values. For example, if two pages are very similar, a webmaster may decide to use rel=canonical to signal the search engine that only one of those pages has value. This is not definitive, though. If the “cornflower widget” page is rel=canonical-ed to the “blue widgets” page, but the cornflower widget page has more valuable links pointing to it, the search engine may choose to use the cornflower widget page instead. If the canonical is accepted, the values of both elements on the pages and links pointing to the pages are combined.

Removing Pages With No Index

Noindex is more definitive. It works similarly to robots.txt except that instead of being prevented from crawling that page, the search engine is able to access it, but then is told to go away. The search engine will still collect links on the page to add to the database (unless a directive on the page also indicates not to follow them, i.e. nofollow), and it will still assign value to links pointing to that page.
search-engine-spider8
However, it will not consolidate value with any other pages, and it will not stop value from flowing through the page. All noindex does is request the search engine not assign the page to its index.
Therefore, there is only one definitive way to stop the flow of link value at the destination. Taking the page away completely (404 or 410 status) is the only way to stop it. 410 is more definitive than 404, as you can read here, but both will cause the page to be dropped out of the index eventually. There are multiple other ways to stop link flow from the origination of the link, but webmasters seldom have control over other sites, only their own.

 

 

Google Now Supports Crawling & Indexing Locale-Adaptive Web Pages:

Google adds support for web pages that dynamically change their content based on IP origin or language settings.

Google announced new support for their crawlers with locale-adaptive web pages, web pages that change the content based on the user’s country origin and/or language settings.
For example, web sites/web pages that you visit that automatically change the content on the page based on you coming from France versus the United States or web pages that automatically change the content on the page based on your language settings being set on French versus U.S.-English. Previously, Google didn’t handle that well or actually at all – they would just see the U.S.-English version of the web page.
Now Google will be able to handle such content by sending GoogleBot from different IPs across the world, as well as let it set language settings. Here are the two methods:
  • Geo-distributed crawling where Googlebot would start to use IP addresses that appear to be coming from outside the USA, in addition to the current IP addresses that appear to be from the USA that Googlebot currently uses.
  • Language-dependent crawling where Googlebot would start to crawl with an Accept-Language HTTP header in the request.
Google still strongly recommends you use different URLs or TLDs based on having content specific for different countries or languages. Google said:
These new configurations do not alter our recommendation to use separate URLs with rel=alternate hreflang annotations for each locale. We continue to support and recommend using separate URLs as they are still the best way for users to interact and share your content, and also to maximize indexing and better ranking of all variants of your content.
So if you are using the rel=alternate hreflang annotations with separate URLs, keep doing so.
This new support is meant to solve a problem Google is having with understanding sites that deploy locale-adaptive techniques. Google said, “new crawling configurations are enabled automatically for pages we detect to be locale-adaptive, you may notice changes in how we crawl and show your site in Google search results without you altering your CMS or server settings.”

 

 

Tuesday, 19 May 2015

Best SEO And Digital Marketing Services Starts From $199/Month.

To request a proposal please write us on: pooorneshh@gmail.com

Skype: poornesh.mishra

Call: +91 983 984 0431

Monday, 1 December 2014

Google “Pigeon” Updates Local Search Algorithm With Stronger Ties To Web Search Signal

pigeon-map2-ss-1920
Google has released a new algorithm to provide a more useful, relevant and accurate local search results that are tied more closely to traditional web search ranking signals. The changes will be visible within the Google Maps search results and Google Web search results.
Note: We’ve named this update the Pigeon update.
The core changes are behind the scenes, but it does impact local search results rankings and some local businesses may notice an increase or decrease in web site referrals, leads and business from the change.
Google told us that the new local search algorithm ties deeper into their web search capabilities, including the hundreds of ranking signals they use in web search along with search features such as Knowledge Graph, spelling correction, synonyms and more.
In addition, Google said that this new algorithm improves their distance and location ranking parameters.
The new algorithm is currently rolling out for US English results and aims to provide a more useful and relevant experience for searchers seeking local results. Google didn’t share any details about if and when the update would roll out more widely in other countries and languages.
Google has not commented on the percent of queries impacted by this algorithm update, nor if certain web spam algorithms were deployed in this update.
If you have noticed any ranking changes and referral changes for your local business, please let us know in the comments.

58% Of Local Marketers Will Change Tactics After Pigeon Update

Columnist Myles Anderson shares the results of an InsideLocal survey detailing the impact of Google's recent local algorithm update, Pigeon.

pigeon2-ss-1920
There has been much expert analysis and published research on the impact of Google’s Pigeon Update.
In this post, I am going to share the results of some recent polls we conducted with attendees on a recent InsideLocal webinar, the topic of which was “The Impact of Pigeon.” (Note: webinar recording can be watched here.)
We wanted to measure the experiences and observations of the 600+ SEOs and SMBs on the webinar to see how they compared to the published, “expert” viewpoints.
We asked 4 questions, and here is what we found out.

1. Has Pigeon Delivered Good Changes For Businesses & Searchers?

Pigeon Update - Good for Searchers and Businesses
Respondents: 402
Key Findings:
  • 69% believe that Pigeon has delivered good change for searchers
  • 53% believe that Pigeon is bad for businesses
Commentary:
The general consensus is that Pigeon has delivered better changes for searchers than for businesses.  The tighter geographic radius of results implies greater targeting of results, and the re-focusing of the “centroid” around the user and not the city makes results more user-centric.
There have been plenty of complaints about increased spam appearing in results, which isn’t good for anyone.
But this issue may be overplayed; renowned local search expert Mike Blumenthalpointed out during the webinar that increased spam is typical of other recent Google updates (e.g. Hummingbird), and Google will tackle this issue in time.

 2. Have You Changed Your Local Search Strategy Since Pigeon Update?

Have you changed strategy since Google Pigeon Update
Respondents: 441
Key Findings:
  • 58% have changed or plan to change their search strategy due to Pigeon update
  • 33% won’t change their search strategy
Commentary:
The majority of those who completed the poll have either adjusted their search strategy or plan to do so. A number of Pigeon studies have pointed towards more power being given to traditional organic search ranking factors, such as domain authority and links, while pure local signals have lost power.
What the poll didn’t ask (simply because we didn’t have time) is what these strategy changes include. An obvious conclusion would be that SEOs/SMBs would focus more on such Organic signals, but is this a wise move? Google will release further updates which may reverse the direction they’ve taken here.
The consensus of the expert panelists on last week’s webinar (who were Mike BlumenthalJoy Hawkins and Andrew Shotland) is that businesses shouldn’t obsess about Google. They are better off focusing on a diversified marketing strategy which focuses on activities which build their brand, reputation and relationships.
This will ultimately deliver more customers from a variety of sources and most likely greater search visibility with it. Google will reward businesses that have high trust & engagement factors.

3. Have You Gained Or Lost Traffic Since Pigeon?

Impact on website traffic since Pigeon Update
Respondents: 365
Key Findings:
  • 37% have lost traffic vs. 28% who gained traffic
  • 87% saw only a small amount of change
Commentary:
In this poll we asked about all search traffic; we didn’t specify local search traffic vs. organic traffic.
The results show that any shifts in traffic have been minor for the majority of businesses — just 13% have seen significant losses or gains. It’s likely that those that lost significant traffic have some fundamental issues with either their organic signals or their Google+ Listings (e.g. hidden dupes or “closed location” dupes, which are massively dragging them down).
Some industries have seen local packs stripped out completely (e.g. Realtors) so these are likely be some of the worst affected businesses.
On the whole, more businesses claimed to have lost traffic rather than gained. But is this drop in quantity offset by an increase in quality? Let’s find out….

4.  Have You Received Better Converting Traffic Since Pigeon?

Better Converting Leads Since Pigeon Update
Respondents: 376
Key Findings:
  • 24% have witnessed worse converting traffic vs. 18% who have had better converting traffic
  • 58% have seen no change pre/post Pigeon
Commentary:
Much has been made of the increased relevance of results since Pigeon. Tighter geo-graphic radii and smaller pack sizes should be giving users a more targeted set of businesses to choose from.
A common theory about Pigeon is that while volume of traffic may have dropped, the clicks generated would deliver more targeted traffic leading to higher conversion.
Unfortunately, the results of this poll don’t concur – 82% of respondents said they have seen the same or lower conversions, while just 18% have seen better converting traffic.

Conclusions

Considering the responses to all four survey questions, the overriding feeling is that Pigeon hasn’t delivered a major shock to most SEOs/SMBs. The impact of the update varies depending on the specific circumstances of a business and there are few clear winners or losers.
However, over 50% of businesses/consultants plan to modify their search strategies to cope better with these changes. These changes should certainly take a long-term view into account — i.e. less chasing down Google and more focus on building the reputation and authority of your business.
Given that both traffic volume and quality appear to be lower, now is a great time to diversify away from Google and build a more diverse customer engagement and acquisition strategy. If this is done well and builds brand value and authority, then increased search visibility should follow.

What Is The Google Pigeon Update?

Launched on July 24, 2014 for U.S. English results, the “Pigeon Update” is a new algorithm to provide more useful, relevant and accurate local search results that are tied more closely to traditional web search ranking signals. Google stated that this new algorithm improves their distance and location ranking parameters.